Bilinear differential operators and $\mathfrak {osp}(1|2)$-relative cohomology on $\mathbb{R}^{1|1}$
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33044/revuma.2100Abstract
We consider the $1|1$-dimensional real superspace $\mathbb{R}^{1|1}$ endowed with its standard contact structure defined by the 1-form $\alpha$. The conformal Lie superalgebra $\mathcal{K}(1)$ acts on $\mathbb{R}^{1|1}$ as the Lie superalgebra of contact vector fields; it contains the Möbius superalgebra $\mathfrak{osp}(1|2)$. We classify $\mathfrak{osp}(1|2)$-invariant superskew symmetric binary differential operators from $\mathcal{K}(1)\wedge\mathcal{K}(1)$ to $\mathfrak{D}_{\lambda,\mu;\nu}$ vanishing on $\mathfrak{osp}(1|2)$, where $\mathfrak{D}_{\lambda,\mu;\nu}$ is the superspace of bilinear differential operators between the superspaces of weighted densities. This result allows us to compute the second differential $\mathfrak{osp}(1|2)$-relative cohomology of $\mathcal{K}(1)$ with coefficients in $\mathfrak{D}_{\lambda,\mu;\nu}$.
Downloads
References
M. Ben Ammar and M. Boujelbene, $sl(2)$-trivial deformations of $Vect_Pol(R)$-modules of symbols, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. 4 (2008), Paper 065, 19 pp. MR 2470531.
M. Ben Ammar, A. Jabeur, and I. Safi, Cohomology of $osp(1|2)$ acting on the space of bilinear differential operators on the superspace $R^{1|1}$, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 9 (2012), no. 4, 1250033, 15 pp. MR 2917312.
N. Ben Fraj, M. Abdaoui, and H. Raouafi, On $osp(1|2)$-relative cohomology of the Lie superalgebra of contact vector fields on $R^{1|1}$, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 14 (2017), no. 2, 1750022, 29 pp. MR 3599017.
S. Bouarroudj, Cohomology of the vector fields Lie algebras on $RP^1$ acting on bilinear differential operators, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 2 (2005), no. 1, 23–40. MR 2121353.
S. Bouarroudj, Projective and conformal Schwarzian derivatives and cohomology of Lie algebras vector fields related to differential operators, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 3 (2006), no. 4, 667–696. MR 2237900.
S. Bouarroudj, On $sl(2)$-relative cohomology of the Lie algebra of vector fields and differential operators, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 14 (2007), no. 1, 112–127. MR 2287837.
S. Bouarroudj and V. Yu. Ovsienko, Three cocycles on $Diff(S^1)$ generalizing the Schwarzian derivative, Internat. Math. Res. Notices 1998, no. 1, 25–39. MR 1601874.
C. H. Conley, Conformal symbols and the action of contact vector fields over the superline, J. Reine Angew. Math. 633 (2009), 115–163. MR 2561198.
D. B. Fuks, Cohomology of Infinite-Dimensional Lie Algebras, Contemporary Soviet Mathematics, Consultants Bureau, New York, 1986. MR 0874337.
C. Kassel, Quantum Groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 155, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995. MR 1321145.
P. B. A. Lecomte and V. Yu. Ovsienko, Cohomology of the vector fields Lie algebra and modules of differential operators on a smooth manifold, Compositio Math. 124 (2000), no. 1, 95–110. MR 1797655.
A. Nijenhuis and R. W. Richardson, Jr., Deformations of homomorphisms of Lie groups and Lie algebras, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1967), 175–179. MR 0204575.
V. Yu. Ovsienko and K. Rozhe, Extensions of the Virasoro group and the Virasoro algebra by means of modules of tensor densities on $S^1$, Funct. Anal. Appl. 30 (1996), no. 4, 290–291. MR 1444471.
V. Ovsienko and S. Tabachnikov, Projective Differential Geometry Old and New, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 165, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005. MR 2177471.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Abderraouf Ghallabi, Meher Abdaoui
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The Journal may retract the paper after publication if clear evidence is found that the findings are unreliable as a result of misconduct or honest error.