Quita de subsidios a la energía en Argentina: análisis de bienestar mediante un MEGC

Authors

  • Leonardo Mastronardi Instituto de Economía UADE - Universidad Argentina de la Empresa, Argentina
  • Martín N. Mayer Instituto de Economía UADE - Universidad Argentina de la Empresa, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2015.731

Keywords:

Computable general equilibrum, Energy, SAM, Benefits

Abstract

The paper estimates the effects on the argentine household welfare due to a partial subsidy cut on the energy sectors. In order to do so, a computable general equilibrium approach was chosen. This model presents a detailed disaggregation of the energy sectors and households. The results on welfare are ambiguous and depend heavily on the compensatory measure chosen by the government.

Downloads

References

Ahmed, S., & Preckel, P. (July - August 2007). A Comparison of RAS and Entropy Methods in Updating IO Tables. Trabajo presentado en la Annual Meeting at the American Agricultural Economics Association, Portland, Oregón (pp. 1-20). Recuperado de http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/9847/1/sp07ah01.pdf

Bacharach, M. (1970). Biproportional Matrices and Input-Output Change. University of Cambridge, Department of Applied Economics, Monographs, No. 16. Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.

Chisari, O., Ferro, G., González, M., León, S., Maquieyra, A., Mastronardi, L., ...& Theller, R. (2010). Un modelo de equilibrio general computable para la Argentina 2006. Instituto de Economía. FACE- UADE, Serie de textos de discusión No. 63. Buenos Aires: Ediciones UADE.

Energy Sector Management Assistance Program. (2004). Energy Policies and the Mexican Economy. Washington, D.C: The WorldBank. Recuperado de https://goo.gl/PmHDhS

Kosmo, M. (1987). Money to burn? The High Costs of Energy Subsidies. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute. Recuperado de http://pdf.wri.org/moneytoburn_bw.pdf

Löfgren, H. (1995). Macro and micro effects of subsidy cuts: a short-run CGE analysis for Egypt. The Middle East Business and Economic Review, 7 (2), 18-39.

McDougall, R. (1999). Entropy Theory and RAS are Friends. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, GTAP Working Paper No. 06. Recuperado de https://goo.gl/LtzPGu

Ministerio de Economía de la Nación Argentina. (2010). Asignación Universal por Hijo en Argentina. Dirección de Empleo e Ingresos, Nota técnica No. 23.

Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. (2014). Cuentas Nacionales de la República Argentina: Año base 2004. Dirección Nacional de Cuentas Nacionales, Serie Documentos de Trabajo No. 23.

Pitt, M. (1983). Equity, externalities and energy subsidies: the case of kerosene in Indonesia. University of Minnesota, Discussion Paper No. 181. Recuperado de https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/55273/1983-181.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Romero, C. A. (2009). Calibración de modelos de equilibrio general computado: métodos y práctica usual. MPRA Paper 17767, Recuperado de https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/17767.html

Published

2015-11-11 — Updated on 2021-11-12

Versions

How to Cite

Mastronardi, L., & Mayer, M. N. (2021). Quita de subsidios a la energía en Argentina: análisis de bienestar mediante un MEGC. Estudios económicos, 32(65), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2015.731 (Original work published November 11, 2015)

Issue

Section

Articles
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 5