Quita de subsidios a la energía en Argentina: análisis de bienestar mediante un MEGC

Authors

  • Leonardo Mastronardi Instituto de Economía UADE - Universidad Argentina de la Empresa, Argentina
  • Martín N. Mayer Instituto de Economía UADE - Universidad Argentina de la Empresa, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2015.731

Keywords:

Computable general equilibrum, Energy, SAM, Benefits

Abstract

The paper estimates the effects on the argentine household welfare due to a partial subsidy cut on the energy sectors. In order to do so, a computable general equilibrium approach was chosen. This model presents a detailed disaggregation of the energy sectors and households. The results on welfare are ambiguous and depend heavily on the compensatory measure chosen by the government.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, S., & Preckel, P. (July - August 2007). A Comparison of RAS and Entropy Methods in Updating IO Tables. Trabajo presentado en la Annual Meeting at the American Agricultural Economics Association, Portland, Oregón (pp. 1-20). Recuperado de http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/9847/1/sp07ah01.pdf

Bacharach, M. (1970). Biproportional Matrices and Input-Output Change. University of Cambridge, Department of Applied Economics, Monographs, No. 16. Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.

Chisari, O., Ferro, G., González, M., León, S., Maquieyra, A., Mastronardi, L., ...& Theller, R. (2010). Un modelo de equilibrio general computable para la Argentina 2006. Instituto de Economía. FACE- UADE, Serie de textos de discusión No. 63. Buenos Aires: Ediciones UADE.

Energy Sector Management Assistance Program. (2004). Energy Policies and the Mexican Economy. Washington, D.C: The WorldBank. Recuperado de https://goo.gl/PmHDhS

Kosmo, M. (1987). Money to burn? The High Costs of Energy Subsidies. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute. Recuperado de http://pdf.wri.org/moneytoburn_bw.pdf

Löfgren, H. (1995). Macro and micro effects of subsidy cuts: a short-run CGE analysis for Egypt. The Middle East Business and Economic Review, 7 (2), 18-39.

McDougall, R. (1999). Entropy Theory and RAS are Friends. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, GTAP Working Paper No. 06. Recuperado de https://goo.gl/LtzPGu

Ministerio de Economía de la Nación Argentina. (2010). Asignación Universal por Hijo en Argentina. Dirección de Empleo e Ingresos, Nota técnica No. 23.

Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. (2014). Cuentas Nacionales de la República Argentina: Año base 2004. Dirección Nacional de Cuentas Nacionales, Serie Documentos de Trabajo No. 23.

Pitt, M. (1983). Equity, externalities and energy subsidies: the case of kerosene in Indonesia. University of Minnesota, Discussion Paper No. 181. Recuperado de https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/55273/1983-181.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Romero, C. A. (2009). Calibración de modelos de equilibrio general computado: métodos y práctica usual. MPRA Paper 17767, Recuperado de https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/17767.html

Published

2015-11-11 — Updated on 2021-11-12

Versions

How to Cite

Mastronardi, L., & Mayer, M. N. (2021). Quita de subsidios a la energía en Argentina: análisis de bienestar mediante un MEGC. Estudios económicos, 32(65), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2015.731 (Original work published November 11, 2015)

Issue

Section

Articles