Trans-pacific-partnership: el complejo camino del acuerdo del siglo XXI

Authors

  • Rodrigo Cuevas Universidad de Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2014.742

Keywords:

regional trade agreements, negotiating process, trade blocs, free trade

Abstract

This paper research the most important negotiation process of Regional Trade Agreements (RTA) that has been developing actually, which one could take effect in how RTA would be negotiated in the future. From the analyzing of the specifics characteristics of this case, in the context of a explosive increment of RTA and the stagnation of talks in multilateral system it will argue that the main consequence of a successful end of the current negotiation process would be the creation of Free Trade Area designed in the terms of US interest.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Index of Economic Freedom. http://www.heritage.org/index/

Regional Trade Agreements Information System (RTA-IS), World Trade Organization (Australia). Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Recuperado de http://www.dfat.gov.au

Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Brunei. Recuperado de http://www.mofat.gov.bn

Dirección de Relaciones Económicas Internacionales, Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores. Chile.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Trade. Canadá. Recuperado de www.international.gc.ca

Office of the United States Trade Representative. EE.UU. Recuperado de www.ustr.gov

Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Japan. Recuperado de http://www.mofa.go.jp/

Ministry of International Trade and Industry. Malasia. Recuperado de www.miti.gov.my

Secretaría de Economía. México. Recuperado de www.economia.gob.mx

Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Nueva Zelanda. Recuperado de http://www.mfat.govt.nz

Acuerdos Comerciales del Perú. Perú. Recuperado de www.acuerdoscomerciales.gob.pe

Singapore FTA. Singapur. Recuperado de www.fta.gov.sg

Ministry of Industry and Trade. Vietnam. Recuperado de www.moit.gov.vn/

Fuentes Secundarias

Aaronson, S. A. & Abouharb, M. R. (2013). Does the WTO help member states improve governance? World Trade Review, 1-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745613000244

Baccini, L., Dür, A., Elsig, M., & Milwwicz, K. (2011). The Design of Preferential Trade Agreements: A New Dataset in The Making. Staff Working Paper ERSD -2011-10. Economic Research and Statistic Division, World Trade Organization.

Baldwin, R. (1993). A Domino Theory of Regionalism. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper N°4465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w4465

Bhagwatti, J. (2008). Termites in the Trading System. How preferential Trade Agreements Undermine Free Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331653.003.0001

Capling, A. & Ravenhill J. (2012). Multilateralizing Regionalism or Securitization?. En Lim. C. L, Elms, D. K., & Low, P. (Eds.). The Trans-Pacific Partnership. A quest for a Twenty-first Century Trade Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carpenter, T. (2008). A historical perspective on Regionalism. En Baldwin, R., & Low, P. (Eds.) Multilateralizing Regionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crouch, C. (2001). The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. United Kingdom: Polity Press.

Elms, D. K., & Low, P. (Eds.) (2013). Global value chains in a changing world. World Trade Organization/ Fung Global Institute/ Tomasek Foundation for Trade & Negotiations. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30875/0b68ab34-en

Elsig, M. (2007). The EU's Choice of Regulatory Venues for Trade Negotiations: A Tale of Agency Power? Journal of Common Market Studies,(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00754.x

Feinberg, R. (2003). The Political Economy of United States Free Trade Arrangements. World Economy, (26), 77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00561

Fergusson, I., & Vaughn, B. (2011). The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. Congressional Research Service, R4052. Recuperado de www.crs.gov

Frankel, S. (2012). The Intellectual Property Chapter in the TPP. En Lim. C. L, Elms, Deborah K., & Low, P. (Eds.). The Trans-Pacific Partnership. A quest for a Twenty-first Century Trade Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gallagher, P. (2005). The First Ten Years of the WTO 1995-2005. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30875/dbbfd01d-en

Goode, W. (2005). Dictionary of Policy Trade Terms. Cambridge University Press.

Hall, P. (1987). The movement from Keynesianism to monetarism: Institutional analysis and British economic policy in the 1970s. En Steinmo S., Thelen K., & Longstreth F. Structuring politics Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Horn, H., Mavroidis, P., & Sapir, A. (2009) Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US preferential trade agreements. Bruegel Blueprint Series. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1411066

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators. Methodology and Analytical Issues. Policy Research Working Paper 5430. The World Bank.

Debería Lewis, M. K. (2011). The Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Paradigm or Wolf in Sheep's Clothing? Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 34(1), 27-52.

Liang, M. (2012). Trade negotiations: rules of origin. En Lim. C. L, Elms, D. K., & Low, P. (Eds.) The Trans-Pacific Partnership. A quest for a Twenty-first Century Trade Agreement. Cambridge University Press.

Lim. C. L, Elms, D. K., & Low, P. (Eds.) (2012). The Trans-Pacific Partnership. A quest for a Twenty-first Century Trade Agreement. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236775

Low, P. (2012). The TPP in a Multilateral World. En Lim. C. L, Elms, D. K., & Low, P. (Eds.). The Trans-Pacific Partnership. A quest for a Twenty-first Century Trade Agreement Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236775.026

Organización Mundial del Comercio (OMC). (2003). Los textos jurídicos. Los resultados de la Ronda Uruguay de Negociaciones Comerciales Multilaterales. Organización Mundial del Comercio. Ginebra: Autor

Organización Mundial del Comercio (OMC). (2011). La OMC y los acuerdos comerciales preferenciales: de la coexistencia a la coherencia. Informe de Comercio Mundial. Organización Mundial de Comercio. Ginebra: Autor

Ravenhill, J. (2011). Regional Trade Agreements. En Ravenhill, J. (Ed.). Global Political Economy. Oxford University Press. Pp.179-185.

Rosales, O., & Herreros, S. (2014). Mega-regional trade negotiations: what is at stake for Latin America? Working Paper. Inter-American Dialogue, January.

Schott, J., Kotschwar, B., & Muir, J. (2013). Understanding the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Policy Analysis in International Economics. Peterson Institute for International Economic.

Schott, J. & Muir, J. (2012). US PTA's: what's been done and what it means for the TPP negotiations. En Lim. C. L, Elms, D. K., & Low, P. (Eds.). The Trans-Pacific Partnership. A quest for a Twenty-first Century Trade Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stiglitz, J. (2002). La Globalización y sus descontentos. Buenos Aires: Taurus.

Wilhelmy, M. (2007). Beyond P4. New Zealand International Review. (32), 2.

Williamson, J. (2004). A short history of the Washington Consensus. Conferencia en Fundación CIDOB, Barcelona, 24-25 de Septiembre de 2004. Recuperado de www.piie.com

Downloads

Published

2014-11-03

How to Cite

Cuevas, R. (2014). Trans-pacific-partnership: el complejo camino del acuerdo del siglo XXI. Estudios económicos, 31(63), 25–56. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2014.742

Issue

Vol. 31 No. 63 (2014)

Section

Articles

License

The authors who publish in Estudios económicos agree to the following terms:

The authors retain copyright and guarantee to the journal the right to be the first to publish the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.

Authors may separately enter into additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC