Integración de la Economía con la Psicología: Richard H. Thaler, Premio Nóbel de Economía 2017

Autores

  • José G. Vargas Hernández Universidad de Guadalajara, México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2018.1374

Palavras-chave:

empujón, economía conductual, efecto de dotación, contabilidad mental, racionalidad limitada

Resumo

Este trabajo pretende analizar las principales contribuciones de Richard H. Thaler a la ciencia de la economía del comportamiento, las cuales han sido consideradas para otorgarle el Premio Nobel Sveriges Riksbank de Economía en 2017. Sus aportaciones incorporan la psicología en los procesos de tomas de decisiones económicas apartándose de la racionalidad instrumental y la teoría de la elección racional para contribuir a la generación de una nueva perspectiva en la teoría económica y en la política económica. El método empleado es fundamentalmente el analítico-descriptivo basado en una revisión de sus principales publicaciones realizadas. Finalmente se concluye que Thaler y sus colaboradores ejercen una infl uencia relevante al generar un nuevo marco de referencia para explicar y predecir resultados económicos desde un acercamiento del comportamiento racional limitado, la teoría de contabilidad limitada y el modelo de planeador-hacedor bajo el concepto de empujón o nudge, el cual tiene un impacto en el diseño e implementación de las políticas públicas.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Thaler, R. H. (2006). Individual Preferences, Monetary Gambles, and Stock Market Participation: A Case for Narrow Framing. American Economic Review, 96(4), 1069-1090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.4.1069

Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Thaler, R.H. (2003). A Survey of Behavioral Finance. In G.M. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, (pp. 1051-1121). North Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.

Benartzi, S. & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Myopic Loss-Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Economics110(1), 75-92 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2118511

Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1999). Risk Aversion or Myopia? Choices in Repeated Gambles and Retirement Investments. Management Science, 45(3), 64-381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.3.364

Benartzi, S. & Thaler, R. H. (2013). Behavioral Economics and the Retirement Savings Crises. Science 339, 1152-1153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231320

Camerer, C. F. (2014). Behavioral Economics. Current Biology, 24(18), R867-R871 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.040

Camerer, C. F., Babcock L., Loewenstein G., & Thaler, R. H. (1997). Labor Supply of New York City Cab Drivers: One Day at a Time. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 407-442 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555244

Dellavigna, S. (2009). Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315-372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.315

Jolls, C., Sunstein C., & Thaler, R. H. (1998). A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics. 50 Stanford Law Review, 1471-1550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1229304

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6),1325-1348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261737

Kahneman, D., Knetsch J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986a). Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics. Journal of Business, 59(4), 285-S300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/296367

Kahneman, D., Knetsch J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986b). Fairness as a Constraint on Profi t Seeking. American Economic Review, 76(4), 728-741

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Kurzban, R. (2012). Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835997

Lamont, O. A. & Thaler, R. H. (2003). Can the Market Add and Subtract? Mispricing in Tech Stock Carve-outs. Journal of Political Economy, 111(2),227-268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/367683

Lee, C. M. C., Shleifer, A., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Investor Sentiment and the Closed-End Fund Puzzle. Journal of Finance, 46(1), 75-109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03746.x

Post T., van dem Assem M. J., Baltussen G., & Thaler, R. H. (2008). Deal or No Deal? Decision Making under Risk in a Large-Payoff Game Show. American Economic Review, 98(1), 38-71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.1.38

Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 11-46

Shafir, E. & Thaler, R. H. (2006). Invest Now, Drink Later, Spend Never: On the Mental Accounting of Delayed Consumption. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(5), 94-712 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.05.008

Shefrin, H. M. & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance, 40(3),777-790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05002.x

Shefrin, H. M. & Thaler, R. H. (1988). The Behavioral Life-Cycle Hypothesis. Economic Inquiry, 26(4), 09-643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01520.x

Shiller, R. J. (2012). Finance and the Good Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron. University of Chicago Law Review, 70(4), 1159-1202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1600573

Thaler, R. H. (1974). The Value of Saving a Life: A Market Estimate. PhD thesis, University of Rochester

Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(1), 39-60 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7

Thaler, R. H. (1981). Some Empirical Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency. Economics Letters, 8(3), 201-207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(81)90067-7

Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199

Thaler, R. H. (1994). Psychology and Savings Policies. American Economic Review, 84(2), 186-192

Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental Accounting Matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183-206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199909)12:3<183::AID-BDM318>3.0.CO;2-F

Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company

Thaler, R. H., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save More Tomorrow TM: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1), S164-S187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/380085

Thaler, R. H., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even: the Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643-660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643

Thaler, R. H., & Rosen, S. (1976). The Value of Saving a Life. In: N.H. Terleckyj (ed.) Household Production and Consumption. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research

Thaler, R. H., & Shefrin, H. M. (1981). An Economic Theory of Self-Control. Journal of Political Economy, 89(2), 392-406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260971

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 93(2), 175-179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321947001

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press

Thaler, R. H., Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., & Schwartz, A. (1997). The Effect of Myopia and Loss Aversion on Risk Taking: An Experimental Test. Quarterly Journal of Economics112(2), 647-661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555226

White, M. D. (2013). The manipulation of choice: Ethics and libertarian paternalism. The Independent Review, 18(2), Fall 2013

Publicado

2018-12-29 — Atualizado em 2021-09-25

Versões

Como Citar

Vargas Hernández, J. G. (2021). Integración de la Economía con la Psicología: Richard H. Thaler, Premio Nóbel de Economía 2017. Estudios económicos, 35(71), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2018.1374 (Original work published 29º de dezembro de 2018)

Edição

Seção

Notas e Comentários