University-industry collaboration importance in innovative brazilian industrial firms: a sectorial model

Ronivaldo Steingraber; Flávio de Oliveira Goncalves

doi:10.52292/j.estudecon.2017.708

Autores

Ronivaldo Steingraber Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina
Flávio de Oliveira Goncalves Universidad Federal do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2017.708

Palavras-chave:

University-industry collaboration, Innovation, Brazilian Industry, Productivity

Resumo

This article examines empirically the university-industry collaboration (UIC) importance in innovative firms on Brazilian industry. This relation is considered an important tool for economic growth in innovation-led firms. It was used a hierarchical regression model for 25.667 innovative industrial firms in the year 2005, the innovation involves product, process, or organizational change. The Total Factor Productivity was introduced as independent variable, because it can be used in all firms as performance measure, and it was average centralized. The TFP is explained by firm’s internal capabilities, and in industry by the UIC importance. The found results are upward average (positive sign), and downward average (negative sign). The sectorial impact of UIC in the TFP is positive, but near zero. The internal capabilities present exchanged signs between the firm and the industry, only innovative labor have both signs positive. The random effects identify nine industries with upward productivity gains, 8,26 % of total Brazilian industry, and these industries are traditional, low-tech intensity, only the automotive industry is medium-technology. Twenty industries have downward productivity gains, 18,35 % of total Brazilian industry, and between them are high-technology industries, as diverse capital tools, and electronics.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Anatan, L. (2015). Conceptual issues in university to industry knowledge transfer Studies: a literature review. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 711-717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.090

Andersen, E. S., & Lundvall, B. A. (1997). National innovation systems and the dynamics of the division of labor. In: C. Edquist, Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions, and organizations. (pp. 242-265). New York: Routledge.

Antonelli, C. (2003). The economics of innovation, new technologies and structural change. London: Routledge.

Audretsch, D. B. & Lehmann, E. E. & Warning, S. (2005). University spillovers and new fi rm location. Research Policy, 34 (7), 1113-1122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.009

Azagra-Caro, J. M., Barberá-Tomás, D., Edwards-Schachter, M., & Tur, E. M.(2017). Dynamic interactions between university-industry knowledge transfer channels: a case study of the most highly cited academic patent. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.011

Research Policy, 46 (2), 463-474.

Bergebal-Mirabent, J., Garcia, J. L. S., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. E. (2015). University-industry partnerships for the provision of R&D services. Journal of Business Research, 68 (7), 1407-1413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.023

Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-base economic development. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 (1), 175-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5029-z

Carlsson, B., & Jacobsson, S. (1997). Diversity creation and technological systems: a technology policy perspective. In: C. Edquist, Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions, and organizations. (pp. 266-294). New York: Routledge.

Chang, S. H. (2017). The technology networks and development trends on university-industry collaborative patents. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 107-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.006

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94 – Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: sociological and economic approaches to the analysis of social structure, S95-S120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228943

Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31 (7), 1103-1122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00178-0

Colyvas, J., Crow, M., Gelijns, A., Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R. R., Rosenberg, N.,& Sampat, B. N. (2002). How do university inventions get into practice? Management Science, 48 (1), 61-72. Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.61.14272

Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation system: institutional and organizational dimensions. Research Policy, 26 (4-5), 475-491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5