Let it float: new empirical evidence on de facto exchange rate regimes and growth in Latin America

Autores/as

  • Cecilia Bermúdez CONICET - IIESS, Argentina
  • Carlos Dabús CONICET - IIESS, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2015.729

Palabras clave:

Regímenes Cambiarios, Crecimiento Económico, System GMM

Resumen

El trabajo reconsidera la evidencia encontrada por Levy-Yeyati y Sturzenegger (LYS) (2003) sobre la relación entre regímenes cambiarios y crecimiento económico. Utilizamos su clasificación de facto así como su base de datos, a fin de ganar robustez y eficiencia en los resultados. Aplicamos el método System GMM. Además, el trabajo se realiza para una amplia muestra de países así como para el caso de Latinoamérica para el periodo 1974-2004. A diferencia de LYS, nuestra evidencia indica que los regímenes cambiarios no son significativos para explicar el crecimiento económico, tanto para una amplia muestra de países como para Latinoamérica en particular. Sin embargo, en esta región los regímenes flexibles parecen tener más ventajas en términos del rol de los determinantes del crecimiento económico en relación a los otros regímenes cambiarios.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Angrist, J., & Krueger, A. (2001). Instrumental variables and the search for identification: from supply and demand to natural experiments, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (4), 69-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.4.69

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations, Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968

Arellano, M., Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models, Journal of Econometrics, 68 (1), 29-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D

Bailliu, J., Lafrance, R., & Perrault, J. (2003). Does exchange rate policy matter for growth? International Finance, 6 (3), 381-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1367-0271.2003.00123.x

Barro, R., (1997). Determinants of economic growth: a cross-country empirical study, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w5698

Baxter, M., & Stockman, A. (1989). Business cycles and the exchange-rate regime: some international evidence, Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 377-400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(89)90039-1

Beck, T. (2008). The econometrics of finance and growth, World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper Series No. 4608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4608

Bermúdez, C., Dabús, C., & González, G. (2012): Inestabilidad y crecimiento económico: evidencia de América Latina. En S. N. Keifman. Progresos en Crecimiento Económico (pp. 117-165), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Fondo Editorial Consejo.

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel-data models, Journal of Econometrics, 87 (1), 115-143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8

Bordo, M., & Schwartz, A. (1999). Monetary policy regimes and economic perfomance: the historical record. In Handbook of Macroeconomics Vol. 1A (pp. 149-234). Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0048(99)01006-X

Broda, C. (2001). Coping with terms-of-trade shocks: peg versus floats. American Economic Review, 91 (2), 376-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.376

Calvo, G., & Reinhart, C. (2002). Fear of floating, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (2), 379-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753650274

Cooper, R., Dornbusch, R., & Hall, R. (1982). The gold standard: historical facts and future prospects, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 1982, 1-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2534316

De Gregorio, José (1992): The effects of inflation on economic growth: Lessons from Latin America, European Economic Review, 36 (2-3), 417-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(92)90098-H

Eichengreen, B., Rose A., & Wyplosz, C. (1994). Speculative attacks on pegged exchange rate: an empirical exploration with special reference to the European Monetary System, NBER, Working Paper No. 4898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w4898

Fischer, S. (2001). Exchange rate regimes: is the bipolar view correct?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (2), 3-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.2.3

Ghosh, A., Gulde, A., Ostry, J. & Wolf, H. (1996). Does the exchange rate regime matter for inflation and economic growth?, Economic Issues, 2, Washington, D.C., International Monetary Fund.

Ghosh, A., Gulde, A., Ostry, J., & Wolf, H. (1997). Does the nominal exchange rate regime matter?. NBER, Working Paper Series No. 5874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w5874

Ghosh, A., Gulde, A. & Wolf, H. (2000). Currency boards: more than a quick fix?, Economic Policy, 15 (31), 269-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00063

Larraín, F. & Velasco., A. (2001). Exchange rate policy in emerging market economies: the case for floating. Princeton University, Essays in International Economics No. 224.

Levine, R., & Renelt, D., (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross -country regressions, American Economic Review, 82 (4), 942-63.

Levy-Yeyati, E., & Sturzenegger, F. (2003). To float or to fix: evidence on the impact of exchange rate regimes on growth. American Economic Review, 93 (4), 1173-1193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803769206250

Mac Donald, R., (2000). The role of the exchange rate in economic growth: a Euro-zone perspective. National Bank of Belgium, Working Papers Research Series No. 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1705103

Meltzer (1986). Some evidence on the comparative uncertainty under different monetary regimes. In C.D. Campbell and W.R. Dougan (Eds.). Alternative Monetary Regimes. (pp. 122-153). Baltimore M.D.: John Hopkins University Press.

Miles, W. (2006). To float or not to float? Currency regimes and growth. Journal of Economic Development, 31 (2), 91-105.

Mills, T., & Wood G., (1993). Does the exchange rate regime affect the economy?. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 75 (4), 3-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20955/r.75.3-20

Mundell, R., (1995). Exchange rate systems and economic growth. In M. C. Marcuzzo, L. H. Officer, & A. Rosselli (Eds.). Monetary Standars and Exchange Rate. (pp. 13-38). London: Routledge.

Mussa, M., (1986). Nominal exchange rate regimes and the behavior of real exchange rates: evidence and implications. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 25, 117-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(86)90039-4

Ramey, G., & Ramey, V., (1995). Cross-country evidence on the link between volatility and growth. American Economic Review, 85 (5), 1138-1151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w4959

Rolnick, A., & Weber. W. (1997). Money, inflation, and output under fiat and commodity standards. Journal of Political Economy, 105 (6), 1308-1321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/516394

Descargas

Publicado

2015-11-11 — Actualizado el 2021-12-14

Versiones

Cómo citar

Bermúdez, C., & Dabús, C. (2021). Let it float: new empirical evidence on de facto exchange rate regimes and growth in Latin America. Estudios económicos, 32(65), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2015.729 (Original work published 11 de noviembre de 2015)

Número

Sección

Artículos