Expert Evidence, Evidential Reasoning and Institutional Design

Authors

  • Valeria Trotti Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52292/j.dsc.2020.2121

Keywords:

Expert evidence justification, Institutional design, Procedural context

Abstract

This paper consists in an introduction to the debate between Car- men Vázquez, Florencia Rimoldi and Rachel Herdy about different models for the justification of expert evidence. Based on these models’ grounds, it is possible to assess which procedural tools should be enacted by the legislator and the type of practice that must be implemented regarding this type of evidence, in the context of the judicial process. By way of a conclusion, I will point out some pending reflections regarding these points.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Valeria Trotti, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina

Magíster en Derecho y Argumentación, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina y Magíster en Razonamiento Probatorio, Universidades de Girona, España y Génova, Italia.

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Trotti, V. (2020). Expert Evidence, Evidential Reasoning and Institutional Design. Discusiones, 24(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.dsc.2020.2121