Beyond Classic Republicanism. A Critical Commentary On “Public Reasons” by Andrés Rosler

Authors

  • Romina Rekers NEO-CIF/CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52292/j.dsc.2019.2216

Keywords:

Classic Republicanism, Neo-Republicanism, Structural domination

Abstract

lthough the republican tradition and its conception of freedom as non-domination have a leading role for a long time, it was overshadowed by the Berliner binomial that exhausted the conceptions of freedom in negative freedom as non-interference and positive freedom as self-control or self-government. Neorepublicanism revives the republican conception of freedom as non-domination and presents it as an alternative that overcomes those approaches. In Razones públicas Andrés Rosler offers an image of classical republicanism. He highlights that in this tradition freedom as non-domination occupies the main role and informs the rest of the ele- ments of the portrait: virtue, debate, law and homeland. However, in his book the image offered plays a normative role for which it is not equipped. In this paper I will show this gap and pointing out a new gap, highlighted by several authors, between neo-republicanism and structural approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Romina Rekers, NEO-CIF/CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Doctora en Derecho y Ciencias Sociales. Magíster en Derecho y Argumentación. Becaria postdoctoral del CONICET, INEO-CIF/CONICET. Becaria postdoctoral de la Academia Austríaca de Ciencias

Published

2020-04-30

How to Cite

Rekers, R. (2020). Beyond Classic Republicanism. A Critical Commentary On “Public Reasons” by Andrés Rosler. Discusiones, 23(Especial), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.dsc.2019.2216

Issue

Section

Especial Discusiones Libros