Priority of Liberty, Intertemporal Dynamics, and Heterogeneity of interests in balancing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52292/j.dsc.2026.5463Keywords:
Ponderación, Proporcionalidad, Prioridad de la libertad, Dinámicas inter-temporales, Heterogeneidad, Balancing, Proportionality, Priority of Liberty, Intertemporal Dynamics, Heterogeneity of InterestsAbstract
This work offers a critical analysis of Alexy’s balancing formula and its positivist version proposed by Duarte, evaluating their capacities and limitations within the context of practical and legal reasoning. First, it examines the problem of the priority of liberty and the balancing of different individuals’ liberties. Second, the work addresses the problem of the intertemporal dynamics of decisions, highlighting how both Alexy’s formula and Duarte’s version tend to exclude the evaluation of the future consequences of present decisions. Third, the problem of the heterogeneity of interests protected by a single principle is identified. The conclusion argues that, although Alexy’s and Duarte’s formulas do not fully resolve these practical and structural problems, their formalization efforts provide a transparent framework for analysis and critical discussion, preventing practical reasoning from being reduced to obscure intuitions or unexamined rhetorical narratives.
Downloads
References
Alexy, R. (2014). Constitutional Rights and Proportionality. Revus, 22, 51-65.
Alexy, R. (2006). Discourse Theory and Fundamental Rights. En A. Menéndez (ed.), Arguing for Fundamental Rights (pp. 15-32). Dordrecht: Springer.
Attele, C. (1957). Discurso pronunciado ante la Sociedad de Derecho de la Universidad de Oxford [Discurso]. Oxford: Universidad de Oxford.
Beccaria, C. (1764). Dei delitti e delle pene. Livorno.
Duarte, D. (2026). Una vez más: la fórmula positivista del peso. Discusiones, 36(1), 23-56.
Duarte, D. (2018). Gains and Losses in Balancing Social Rights. En D. Duarte y J. S. Sampaio (eds.), Proportionality in Law: An Analytic Perspective (pp. 49-70). Cham: Springer.
Ely, J. H. (1980). Democracy and Distrust. A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ginsburg, T. (2003). Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenwood, J., Seshadri, A. y Yorukoglu, M. (2005). Engines of Liberation. The Review of Economic Studies, 72(1), 109-133.
Mill, J. S. (1859). On Liberty. London: John W. Parker and Son.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York City: Basic Books.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marco Segatti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Discusiones does not withhold rights of reproduction or copyright. Consequently, authors may share the final versions of publications.