On Summarizing Case Law and Precedents: Real Life Cases

Authors

  • Sandra Gómora Juárez Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM, México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52292/j.dsc.2022.3618

Keywords:

Summary of precedents, Case-Law, Ratio decidendi, Rule of precedent, Precedent, Jurisdictional decision

Abstract

This contribution analyzes some thesis of the article “On precedents and the institutionalized mechanisms for identifying rationes decidendi”, the main discussion topic in the current issu of Discusiones. There is no doubt that the problems derived from the so-called maximization of precedents —broadly understood as the institutional practice of extracting in a separate document, the text expressing the ratio decidendi from the judgment considered as a precedent—are very interesting and need to be addressed. The following sections discuss some of the more challenging problems derived from the so-called maximization of precedents, which are the ones that could bring light to the convenience of the very practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sandra Gómora Juárez, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM, México

Doctora en Derecho e investigadora de tiempo completo en el Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)

Published

2022-12-28

How to Cite

Gómora Juárez, S. (2022). On Summarizing Case Law and Precedents: Real Life Cases. Discusiones, 29(2), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.dsc.2022.3618